“Adaptive Comparative Judgement provides a valid way of assessing writing and open-ended tasks that improves professional agreement, removes criteria interpretation, teacher bias and crucially improves reliability.
This talk documents a cross-school research project designed to test how ACJ can be used to moderate and benchmark writing across a local authority or MAT.
The session will explore:
• Why rubrics can often give a false impression of writing ‘ability’
• How teachers assessing writing from schools other than their own can lead to a pragmatic professional consensus of what writing truly looks like.
• How anonymously benchmarking writing against other schools leads to teachers using their professional judgements & increases dialogue.
Steve is currently the Head Teacher at Church Cowley St James Primary in Oxford, UK a position he’s held since 2012. As a teacher he worked in classes from Nursery – KS4 and finally settled in Primary 13 years ago.
Last year, after visiting ResearchEd in Haninge (his first ResearchEd conference) he helped to develop and then ran a pilot scheme of using Adaptive Comparative Judgement (ACJ) to moderate writing across a local authority.
On the back of the successful trials Steve set up www.assessprogress.com to offer ACJ assessment for schools.
We rely entirely on the kindness of the education community to keep going. Please help us keep bringing low-cost events to educators around the world. Donate here to help us raise evidence literacy and bust edu-myths https://t.co/jc6WRrMMUwhttps://t.co/tjM5ItdsH2 5 5
RT @EducEndowFoundn: NEW TODAY: latest EEF guidance report. It offers primary and secondary schools 4 clear and actionable recommendations… 331 0